The following report was prepared by Dr Raul Katz, Director of Business Strategy Research (Columbia Institute for Tele-Information) based on the input from participants in the Economic Experts Roundtable, organized by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) on 26 June 2020, and from research carried out since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. ITU would like to thank Mayssa Issa, Head, Research and Intelligence Practice (Delta Partners Group); Matt Yardley, Managing Partner (Analysys Mason); German Cufre, Global Head, Telecommunications, Media and Technology (International Finance Corporation); Shaun Collins, CEO (CCS Insight); Steve Brazier, President and CEO (Canalys); Paul Lam, Strategy Officer, Digital & Technology (Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank); Tim Kelly, Lead Digital Development Specialist (World Bank); Alison Gillwald, Executive Director (Research ICT Africa); Alexandra Rehak, Chief Analyst (OMDIA); Audrey Plonk, Head, Digital

Economy Division (OECD); Rohan Samrajiva, Chairman (LIRNEasia); Guy Zibi, Managing Director (Xalam Analytics); and Jonathan Woetzel, Director (McKinsey Global Institute) and Senior Partner (McKinsey) for participating in the roundtable. The roundtable was moderated by Tomas Lamanauskas, Special Advisor, Crisis Strategy (ITU) and Catalin Marinescu, Head, Strategy and Planning Division (ITU).

Executive summary The views of the participants of the economic experts roundtable on the impact of COVID19 on digital infrastructure can be synthesized as follows:

• While overall telecommunication networks have exhibited consistent resilience in the face of the changes in traffic, 1 accessible ultra-broadband technologies such as fibreto-the-home (FTTH) appear to be better prepared to respond to spikes in broadband traffic. Countries with the largest deployments of accessible ultra-broadband have exhibited less slowdown in latency and download speed.

• Wi-Fi capacity has been stressed by an 80 per cent increase in PC uploads to cloud computing platforms with additional peaks from video conference calls, 3 , requiring additional spectrum to be assigned for unlicensed use

•As is the case with the whole economy, the pandemic has had an almost immediate impact on the financial performance of digital infrastructure companies. The annual negative revenue impact on telecommunication operators could be up to 10 per cent, with some services requiring 18 to 24 months to return to pre-COVID-19 levels. 4 While media companies have been more significantly affected by the decline in advertising revenues as a result of the ensuing economic recession, Internet platforms have fared better in the economic downturn, which was implicitly reflected in different market capitalizations.

• The increase in traffic has resulted in an acceleration of capital expenditure (CAPEX) related to the expansion of capacity (i.e. operations and maintenance CAPEX). On the other hand, spending not related to an increase in capacity (i.e. network modernization) is being postponed, especially among emerging countries. While the top five African operators spent USD 5.5 to 6 billion in 2019, it was expected that this would drop to USD 4.5 to 5 billion in 2020. Most experts agreed that, in the light of financial pressure, new infrastructure models (e.g. passive, rural and RAN sharing) would become more prevalent to reduce cash outlays.

• Future sources of funding to fill the gap could emerge from some governments (if capable of fostering counter-cyclical measures) or development finance institutions. As an example, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) is deploying a USD 2 billion line of credit and seeking investment opportunities.

•Current conditions of the digital economy sector could lead to industry consolidation, particularly among low-cost telecommunication operators in the developing world5 , and the public cloud, satellite TV, and in-flight Internet access sectors. The roundtable

participants fully agreed on the capacity of digital infrastructure to enhance social and economic resilience in the face of the pandemic:

• While research on the contribution of digitization to mitigate the impact of pandemics is limited, emerging evidence is compelling about its positive effects. In the medium term (e.g. 2021), countries with top connectivity infrastructure could mitigate up to half of the negative economic impact.

• That being said, some factors exist that limit the capacity of digitization to improve social and economic resilience.

• First and foremost, the digital divide has been highlighted as a critical barrier to the mitigation value of digitization. In particular, population unserved or partially served by broadband cannot benefit from distance learning for children, telecommuting, access to e-commerce and healthcare information. Population coverage of 4G networks in Sub-Saharan Africa is 53 per cent and 78 per cent in Eastern Europe. 6 Beyond coverage, demand-side barriers (such as limited affordability and digital illiteracy) have become a critical barrier. Internet adoption in Latin America and the Caribbean is 70 per cent, 38 per cent in Sub-Saharan Africa, and even advanced economies still have some gaps (91 per cent in North America, and 86 per cent in Western Europe).

• While large enterprises benefit from access to well-established digital solutions in place (collaboration tools, employee devices, cloud, VPN, etc.) and connectivity, this is not the case for a large portion of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), particularly in developing countries. The use of the Internet for business purposes in Sub-Saharan Africa is as low as 7 per cent on average.

• Furthermore, the benefits of digital infrastructure for dealing with the pandemic is limited to those industries that are well on their way to digital transformation, such as logistics.

• While supply chains have been fairly resilient with the help of digital technologies, the situation in developing countries is less positive.

• While governments have been very active in deploying policies aimed at improving the resilience of digital infrastructure (over 250 different regulatory responses have been identified around the world),9 the current shock is calling into question some of the basic policy tenets of digitization development, most importantly in terms of how the digital divide needs to be tackled.

In order to increase the power of digitization to mitigate the pandemic disruption, the digital infrastructure sector needs to re-examine some of the digital sector basic fundamental premises that were held before COVID-19:

• It is crucial for governments to learn from these hard lessons and take concrete, actionable measures in the telecommunication sector to enable the private operators to

provide universal access to quality digital infrastructure networks for all and support the development of a digital economy.

• Governments should take a much broader, holistic view of investment in high-speed broadband networks, considering the economic, social and environment/climate benefits and costs of investment.

• Regulatory frameworks may need to be adjusted to stimulate investment whilst maintaining a “sensible” level of competition, shifting from a “purist” to a “pragmatic” viewpoint on State aid regulations.

• It is paramount for governments in emerging markets to keep making progress on digital infrastructure regulation, particularly pertaining to shared infrastructure.

• The roundtable experts argued that COVID-19 could be a window of opportunity to drive digital transformation in sectors which have not promoted it in previous decades. Similar to the effect of SARS in China in 2003 which triggered the tremendous growth in e-commerce, new production modes would emerge. As a result, COVID-19 could become a catalyst for the adoption of digitization in sectors where it had not occurred before, especially in more business-oriented applications.